4 games · 1 flag · 2 of 4 went over the line · avg 6.2 goals (projected 6.4) · flags 1-0-0 (+0.71u at close) · calls: 🔨 SLAM 1-0-0 · 1U – · PASS – · AVOID 2 of 3 stayed under
Breakdown (for scoring):greatgoodmidbadtrash
Team
Result
Goalies
Projection breakdown
Team
G
Proj
Total goals
Proj total
P(7+)
Line
Pick
Goalie
5v5
PP
Gl
Oth
B2B
Spd
Inj
PIT#11 OFF / #23 DEF
4
3.27●
9O 6.5
7.06
56%
6.5 → 6.5
9:00 PM ET 🔨 SLAM W paper W +0.71u
A. Silovs ✓Trash 2
2.21
0.58
+0.5%
0.49
–
-3.5%
+2.4%
UTA#6 OFF / #8 DEF
5
3.79●
S. Cossa ✓Trash 19
2.30
0.68
+4.4%
0.48
–
+3.7%
+1.2%
Matchup: 5-on-5 & power play
Team
5-on-5
Power play
OFF
OPP DEF
Proj
OFF
OPP DEF
Proj
PIT
2.30#3 of 32
1.95#12 of 32
2.21goals
0.58#16 of 32
0.56#12 of 32
0.58goals
UTA
2.22#7 of 32
2.11#22 of 32
2.30goals
0.70#2 of 32
0.54#6 of 32
0.68goals
Key players: top 5 attackers & defenders
Team
Top 5 attackers
Top 5 defenders
Player
If out
Pre-game
Player
If out
Pre-game
PIT
Sidney Crosby C
-3.9%
Plays
Tommy Novak C
+0.9%
Plays
Bryan Rust R
-2.9%
Plays
Ben Kindel C
+0.8%
Plays
Rickard Rakell R
-2.8%
Plays
Samuel Girard D
+0.8%
OUT
Evgeni Malkin C
-2.7%
Plays
Kaedan Korczak D
+0.6%
Plays
Erik Karlsson D
-1.8%
Plays
Egor Chinakhov R
+0.6%
Day-to-day
UTA
Dylan Guenther R
-3.9%
Plays
Clayton Keller R
+1.5%
Plays
Clayton Keller R
-3.8%
Plays
Nate Schmidt D
+1.4%
Plays
Nick Schmaltz C
-3.5%
Plays
Barrett Hayton C
+1.1%
Plays
Logan Cooley C
-2.5%
Plays
Nick Schmaltz C
+1.0%
Plays
Mikhail Sergachev D
-1.5%
Plays
John Marino D
+0.9%
OUT
Also out: UTA: Michael Carcone -0.7% attack, +0.7% defense
Defender numbers are a rough guide: tested on 2021-26 lineups, the defensive side of the injury adjustment is too small and noisy to prove on its own (it swings season to season). Attacker numbers hold up every season.
How the projection moved on game day (6.90 → 7.06)
12:01 AM 6.90 first run
12:52 AM 6.95 +0.05UTA goalie: Karel Vejmelka → Sebastian Cossa +0.05; PIT goalie Arturs Silovs: Projected → Likely
5:33 AM 6.90 -0.05UTA goalie: Sebastian Cossa → Karel Vejmelka -0.05
11:18 AM 6.89 -0.01rounding; UTA lineup: last game's lineup (2026-10-17); Line 6.5 o-125 → 6.5 o-129
12:18 PM 6.89 Line 6.5 o-129 → 6.5 o-130
1:17 PM 6.95 +0.05UTA goalie: Karel Vejmelka → Sebastian Cossa +0.05; UTA lineup: Cole Bagley Oct 19 1:14 PM
2:17 PM 7.00 +0.05Injuries / lineup: Elmer Soderblom (PIT) out, Ville Koivunen (PIT) out, Egor Chinakhov (PIT) back in +0.05; PIT goalie Arturs Silovs: Likely → Confirmed; Egor Chinakhov (PIT) day-to-day; PIT lineup: Josh Getzoff Oct 19 1:38 PM
2:45 PM 7.00 no change
3:18 PM 7.00 Line 6.5 o-130 → 6.5 o-131
4:18 PM 7.00 no change
4:38 PM 6.98 -0.02Injuries / lineup: Ville Koivunen (PIT) back in -0.01; PIT lineup: Projected Oct 19 4:27 PM
5:17 PM 6.98 no change
6:17 PM 6.98 Line 6.5 o-131 → 6.5 o-133
6:45 PM 6.98 no change
7:18 PM 6.98 no change
8:17 PM 6.98 no change
8:26 PM 6.98 no change
8:45 PM 7.06 +0.08Injuries / lineup: Samuel Girard (PIT) out, John Marino (UTA) out, Nick DeSimone (UTA) back in +0.07; UTA lineup: Utah Mammoth Oct 19 8:42 PM
A log of every model run for this game (about hourly, frozen at puck drop): the change in the total and what caused it (a goalie switch, players out / back in, or ratings / other data such as games finished elsewhere and refreshed stats), plus anything else the scraper picked up (goalie confirmed, day-to-day players, a new projected lineup, the line moving), or no change. Each team's change is split by how much each factor moved; small leftovers count as ratings / other.
🔨 SLAM: both teams project as high-scoring (PIT 3.27, UTA 3.79; cutoff 3.10), the line is 6.5, and both are good or better at 5-on-5, the strongest over spot the model has. At 5-on-5, PIT is great (2.21) and UTA is great (2.30); on the power play, PIT is mid (0.58) and UTA is great (0.68). PIT faces Sebastian Cossa, a Trash goalie, grade 19 (+0.5%); UTA faces Arturs Silovs, a Trash goalie, grade 2 (+4.4%). Other factors: PIT's team speed costs 3.5%; injuries help PIT 2.4%; UTA's team speed adds 3.7%. PIT 3.27: 0.16 goals above what an average team would score (3.11). Pushing it up: 5-on-5 matchup +0.17 (its attack ranks #3 of 32, UTA's defense #12); injuries +0.07 (missing players on both teams, net, +2.4%); Sebastian Cossa in goal +0.02 (a Trash goalie, grade 19, +0.5%). Holding it back: team speed -0.11 (it skates slower than UTA, -3.5%).UTA 3.79: 0.69 goals above what an average team would score (3.11). Pushing it up: 5-on-5 matchup +0.26 (its attack ranks #7 of 32, PIT's defense #22); Arturs Silovs in goal +0.15 (a Trash goalie, grade 2, +4.4%); team speed +0.13 (it skates faster than PIT, +3.7%); power play +0.11 (its power play ranks #2, PIT's penalty kill and penalty habits #6); injuries +0.04 (missing players on both teams, net, +1.2%). The model projects 7.06 total goals against a 6.5 line, with a 56% chance of 7 or more (a typical game is about 45%). Games like this went over 55% of the time at the opening line and 56.5% at the closing line in 2021-26. Final: 9 goals (PIT 4, UTA 5), so it went over 6.5 and the call was right.
SJS#23 OFF / #29 DEF
1
3.08●
4U 6.5
6.41
49%
6.5 → 6.5
7:30 PM ET AVOIDnear miss −0.01⚠ lineup ✓ under
Y. Askarov ✓Trash 3
1.91
0.73
-1.3%
0.49
–
-0.4%
–
TOR#21 OFF / #31 DEF
3
3.32●
S. Bobrovsky ✓OK 38
2.04
0.76
+4.1%
0.48
–
+0.1%
-2.8%
⚠ Lineup change since 12:01 AM: William Nylander now Day-to-day (was Plays, seen 11:18 AM) · TOR ±4.6% · projection 6.21 → 6.41
Matchup: 5-on-5 & power play
Team
5-on-5
Power play
OFF
OPP DEF
Proj
OFF
OPP DEF
Proj
SJS
1.79#28 of 32
2.17#26 of 32
1.91goals
0.61#12 of 32
0.66#27 of 32
0.73goals
TOR
1.95#22 of 32
2.13#24 of 32
2.04goals
0.58#15 of 32
0.72#32 of 32
0.76goals
Key players: top 5 attackers & defenders
Team
Top 5 attackers
Top 5 defenders
Player
If out
Pre-game
Player
If out
Pre-game
SJS
Macklin Celebrini C
-4.9%
Plays
Macklin Celebrini C
+0.9%
Plays
Will Smith C
-2.4%
Plays
Tyler Toffoli C
+0.7%
Plays
Tyler Toffoli C
-1.9%
Plays
Will Smith C
+0.7%
Plays
Alexander Wennberg C
-1.0%
Plays
Dmitry Orlov D
+0.7%
Plays
Kiefer Sherwood L
-0.8%
Plays
Sam Dickinson D
+0.4%
Plays
TOR
⚠ William Nylander R
-4.6%
Day-to-daywas Plays
Darren Raddysh D
+0.5%
–
Auston Matthews C
-4.0%
–
Jack Roslovic C
+0.4%
–
John Tavares C
-3.3%
OUT · IR
Kirill Marchenko R
+0.4%
–
Kirill Marchenko R
-1.4%
–
Oliver Ekman-Larsson D
+0.3%
–
Darren Raddysh D
-1.1%
–
Nick Paul L
+0.3%
–
Defender numbers are a rough guide: tested on 2021-26 lineups, the defensive side of the injury adjustment is too small and noisy to prove on its own (it swings season to season). Attacker numbers hold up every season.
How the projection moved on game day (6.21 → 6.41)
12:01 AM 6.21 first run
12:52 AM 6.33 +0.12SJS goalie: Alex Nedeljkovic → Yaroslav Askarov +0.12; TOR goalie Anthony Stolarz: Projected → Likely
5:33 AM 6.33 no change
11:18 AM 6.41 +0.08TOR goalie: Anthony Stolarz → Sergei Bobrovsky +0.08; SJS lineup: last game's lineup (2026-10-17); William Nylander (TOR) day-to-day; TOR lineup: Mark Masters Oct 19 10:47 AM; Line 6.5 o-125 → 6.5 o-126
12:18 PM 6.41 SJS lineup: Max Miller Oct 19 12:00 PM; Line 6.5 o-126 → 6.5 o-130
7:18 PM 6.41 SJS lineup: Sheng Peng Oct 19 7:11 PM; Line 6.5 o-136 → 6.5 o-144
A log of every model run for this game (about hourly, frozen at puck drop): the change in the total and what caused it (a goalie switch, players out / back in, or ratings / other data such as games finished elsewhere and refreshed stats), plus anything else the scraper picked up (goalie confirmed, day-to-day players, a new projected lineup, the line moving), or no change. Each team's change is split by how much each factor moved; small leftovers count as ratings / other.
AVOID: SJS projects under the 3.10-goal high-scoring cutoff (SJS 3.08). SJS just misses the cutoff (by 0.01), and the rule needs both teams over it, so the 6.41 total isn't enough on its own. At 5-on-5, SJS is bad (1.91) and TOR is mid (2.04); on the power play, SJS is great (0.73) and TOR is great (0.76). SJS faces Sergei Bobrovsky, an OK goalie, grade 38 (-1.3%); TOR faces Yaroslav Askarov, a Trash goalie, grade 3 (+4.1%). Other factors: injuries cost TOR 2.8%. SJS 3.08: 0.02 goals below what an average team would score (3.11). Pushing it up: power play +0.15 (its power play ranks #12, TOR's penalty kill and penalty habits #27). Holding it back: 5-on-5 matchup -0.12 (its attack ranks #28 of 32, TOR's defense #26); Sergei Bobrovsky in goal -0.04 (an OK goalie, grade 38, -1.3%); team speed -0.01 (it skates slower than TOR, -0.4%).TOR 3.32: 0.22 goals above what an average team would score (3.11). Pushing it up: power play +0.18 (its power play ranks #15, SJS's penalty kill and penalty habits #32); Yaroslav Askarov in goal +0.13 (a Trash goalie, grade 3, +4.1%). Holding it back: injuries -0.10 (missing players on both teams, net, -2.8%). The model projects 6.41 total goals against a 6.5 line, with a 49% chance of 7 or more (a typical game is about 45%). Games like this went over only 47-49% of the time in 2021-26. Final: 4 goals (SJS 1, TOR 3), so it stayed under 6.5 and the call was right.
COL#2 OFF / #3 DEF
2
4.16●
5U 6.5
6.39
42%
6.5 → 6 ↓
7:00 PM ET AVOID ✓ under
M. Blackwood ✓Mid 44
2.83
0.63
-3.0%
0.49
–
+5.5%
+3.0%
PHI#32 OFF / #19 DEF
3
2.24●
J. Woll ✓Mid 60
1.53
0.41
-1.7%
0.50
–
-4.7%
-2.0%
Matchup: 5-on-5 & power play
Team
5-on-5
Power play
OFF
OPP DEF
Proj
OFF
OPP DEF
Proj
COL
2.65#1 of 32
2.17#27 of 32
2.83goals
0.58#17 of 32
0.60#23 of 32
0.63goals
PHI
1.61#32 of 32
1.94#10 of 32
1.53goals
0.48#27 of 32
0.47#2 of 32
0.41goals
Key players: top 5 attackers & defenders
Team
Top 5 attackers
Top 5 defenders
Player
If out
Pre-game
Player
If out
Pre-game
COL
Nathan MacKinnon C
-7.0%
Plays
Martin Necas C
+1.5%
Plays
Martin Necas C
-5.2%
Plays
Nathan MacKinnon C
+1.4%
Plays
Cale Makar D
-3.2%
Plays
Sam Malinski D
+1.3%
Plays
Brock Nelson C
-2.9%
Plays
Brett Kulak D
+0.9%
Plays
Artturi Lehkonen L
-2.7%
Plays
Cale Makar D
+0.9%
Plays
PHI
Trevor Zegras C
-2.0%
Plays
Jamie Drysdale D
+1.1%
Plays
Matvei Michkov R
-1.9%
Plays
Owen Tippett R
+1.0%
OUT · IR
Travis Konecny R
-1.6%
OUT · IR
Noah Cates L
+0.9%
Plays
Owen Tippett R
-1.5%
OUT · IR
Matvei Michkov R
+0.9%
Plays
Tyson Foerster R
-0.7%
OUT
Trevor Zegras C
+0.9%
Plays
Defender numbers are a rough guide: tested on 2021-26 lineups, the defensive side of the injury adjustment is too small and noisy to prove on its own (it swings season to season). Attacker numbers hold up every season.
How the projection moved on game day (6.49 → 6.39)
12:01 AM 6.49 first run
12:52 AM 6.34 -0.15PHI goalie: Dan Vladar → Joseph Woll -0.10; COL goalie: Mackenzie Blackwood → Scott Wedgewood -0.05
5:33 AM 6.49 +0.15PHI goalie: Joseph Woll → Dan Vladar +0.10; COL goalie: Scott Wedgewood → Mackenzie Blackwood +0.05; Line 6.5 o+109 → 6.5 o+110
11:18 AM 6.38 -0.11PHI goalie: Dan Vladar → Joseph Woll -0.10; Line 6.5 o+110 → 6.5 o+109
12:18 PM 6.38 COL goalie Mackenzie Blackwood: Likely → Confirmed
1:18 PM 6.38 COL lineup: Bailey Curtis Oct 19 1:04 PM
2:17 PM 6.38 COL lineup: Aarif Deen Oct 19 1:57 PM
2:45 PM 6.39 +0.01Injuries / lineup: Tyson Foerster (PHI) out +0.01; PHI lineup: Projected Oct 19 2:26 PM
3:18 PM 6.39 no change
4:18 PM 6.39 no change
4:38 PM 6.39 no change
5:17 PM 6.39 Line 6.5 o+109 → 6.5 o-102
6:17 PM 6.39 no change
6:45 PM 6.39 PHI lineup: Will James Oct 19 6:38 PM
A log of every model run for this game (about hourly, frozen at puck drop): the change in the total and what caused it (a goalie switch, players out / back in, or ratings / other data such as games finished elsewhere and refreshed stats), plus anything else the scraper picked up (goalie confirmed, day-to-day players, a new projected lineup, the line moving), or no change. Each team's change is split by how much each factor moved; small leftovers count as ratings / other.
AVOID: PHI projects under the 3.10-goal high-scoring cutoff (PHI 2.24). The 6.39 total looks high, but most of it comes from COL; the over rule needs both teams scoring. At 5-on-5, COL is great (2.83) and PHI is trash (1.53); on the power play, COL is good (0.63) and PHI is trash (0.41). COL faces Joseph Woll, a Mid goalie, grade 60 (-3.0%); PHI faces Mackenzie Blackwood, a Mid goalie, grade 44 (-1.7%). Other factors: COL's team speed adds 5.5%; injuries help COL 3.0%; PHI's team speed costs 4.7%; injuries cost PHI 2.0%. COL 4.16: 1.05 goals above what an average team would score (3.11). Pushing it up: 5-on-5 matchup +0.79 (its attack ranks #1 of 32, PHI's defense #27); team speed +0.21 (it skates faster than PHI, +5.5%); injuries +0.12 (missing players on both teams, net, +3.0%); power play +0.05 (its power play ranks #17, PHI's penalty kill and penalty habits #23). Holding it back: Joseph Woll in goal -0.12 (a Mid goalie, grade 60, -3.0%).PHI 2.24: 0.87 goals below what an average team would score (3.11). Holding it back: 5-on-5 matchup -0.51 (its attack ranks #32 of 32, COL's defense #10); power play -0.17 (its power play ranks #27, COL's penalty kill and penalty habits #2); team speed -0.11 (it skates slower than COL, -4.7%); injuries -0.05 (missing players on both teams, net, -2.0%); Mackenzie Blackwood in goal -0.04 (a Mid goalie, grade 44, -1.7%). The model projects 6.39 total goals against a 6.5 line, with a 42% chance of 7 or more (a typical game is about 45%). Games like this went over only 47-49% of the time in 2021-26. Final: 5 goals (COL 2, PHI 3), so it stayed under 6.5 and the call was right.
ANA#9 OFF / #22 DEF
2
3.05●
7O 6.5
6.19
48%
6.5 → 6.5
7:00 PM ET AVOIDnear miss −0.04 ✗ went over
V. Husso ✓Trash 10
2.02
0.59
-2.6%
0.49
–
+2.3%
-1.2%
NYR#22 OFF / #9 DEF
5
3.14●
D. Garand ✓Mid 54
1.95
0.69
+2.1%
0.49
–
-2.2%
+0.5%
Matchup: 5-on-5 & power play
Team
5-on-5
Power play
OFF
OPP DEF
Proj
OFF
OPP DEF
Proj
ANA
2.07#13 of 32
1.99#13 of 32
2.02goals
0.60#13 of 32
0.54#7 of 32
0.59goals
NYR
1.86#26 of 32
2.13#24 of 32
1.95goals
0.62#10 of 32
0.62#24 of 32
0.69goals
Key players: top 5 attackers & defenders
Team
Top 5 attackers
Top 5 defenders
Player
If out
Pre-game
Player
If out
Pre-game
ANA
Beckett Sennecke R
-3.3%
Plays
Leo Carlsson C
+0.6%
Plays
Leo Carlsson C
-3.2%
Plays
Beckett Sennecke R
+0.5%
Plays
Cutter Gauthier L
-3.1%
Plays
Cutter Gauthier L
+0.5%
Plays
Mikael Granlund C
-2.0%
Plays
Ian Moore D
+0.4%
OUT · IR
Troy Terry R
-1.4%
OUT · IR
Jackson LaCombe D
+0.3%
Plays
NYR
Mika Zibanejad C
-3.1%
Plays
Alexis Lafrenière L
+0.8%
Plays
Alexis Lafrenière L
-2.5%
Plays
Adam Fox D
+0.7%
Plays
J.T. Miller C
-2.2%
Plays
Pavel Dorofeyev R
+0.7%
Plays
Adam Fox D
-1.8%
Plays
Gabe Perreault R
+0.5%
Plays
Pavel Dorofeyev R
-1.4%
Plays
Oliver Bjorkstrand R
+0.4%
Plays
Defender numbers are a rough guide: tested on 2021-26 lineups, the defensive side of the injury adjustment is too small and noisy to prove on its own (it swings season to season). Attacker numbers hold up every season.
How the projection moved on game day (6.11 → 6.19)
12:01 AM 6.11 first run
12:53 AM 6.11 ANA goalie Lukas Dostal: Projected → Likely; NYR goalie Dylan Garand: Projected → Likely
5:33 AM 6.11 Line 6.5 o+104 → 6.5 o+103
11:18 AM 6.11 NYR goalie Dylan Garand: Likely → Confirmed; NYR lineup: Colin Stephenson Oct 19 10:44 AM; Line 6.5 o+103 → 6.5 o+100
12:17 PM 6.19 +0.08ANA goalie: Lukas Dostal → Ville Husso +0.08; Line 6.5 o+100 → 6.5 o-110
1:18 PM 6.19 ANA lineup: Jonny Lazarus Oct 19 1:01 PM; Line 6.5 o-110 → 6.5 o-111
2:17 PM 6.19 Mikael Granlund (ANA) off day-to-day; ANA lineup: Zach Cavanagh Oct 19 1:24 PM; Line 6.5 o-111 → 6.5 o-110
A log of every model run for this game (about hourly, frozen at puck drop): the change in the total and what caused it (a goalie switch, players out / back in, or ratings / other data such as games finished elsewhere and refreshed stats), plus anything else the scraper picked up (goalie confirmed, day-to-day players, a new projected lineup, the line moving), or no change. Each team's change is split by how much each factor moved; small leftovers count as ratings / other.
AVOID: ANA projects under the 3.10-goal high-scoring cutoff (ANA 3.05). ANA just misses the cutoff (by 0.04), and the rule needs both teams over it, so the 6.19 total isn't enough on its own. At 5-on-5, ANA is mid (2.02) and NYR is mid (1.95); on the power play, ANA is mid (0.59) and NYR is great (0.69). ANA faces Dylan Garand, a Mid goalie, grade 54 (-2.6%); NYR faces Ville Husso, a Trash goalie, grade 10 (+2.1%). Other factors: ANA's team speed adds 2.3%; NYR's team speed costs 2.2%. ANA 3.05: 0.05 goals below what an average team would score (3.11). Pushing it up: team speed +0.07 (it skates faster than NYR, +2.3%); power play +0.01 (its power play ranks #13, NYR's penalty kill and penalty habits #7). Holding it back: Dylan Garand in goal -0.08 (a Mid goalie, grade 54, -2.6%); injuries -0.04 (missing players on both teams, net, -1.2%); 5-on-5 matchup -0.02 (its attack ranks #13 of 32, NYR's defense #13).NYR 3.14: 0.03 goals above what an average team would score (3.11). Pushing it up: power play +0.11 (its power play ranks #10, ANA's penalty kill and penalty habits #24); Ville Husso in goal +0.07 (a Trash goalie, grade 10, +2.1%); injuries +0.02 (missing players on both teams, net, +0.5%). Holding it back: 5-on-5 matchup -0.09 (its attack ranks #26 of 32, ANA's defense #24); team speed -0.07 (it skates slower than ANA, -2.2%). The model projects 6.19 total goals against a 6.5 line, with a 48% chance of 7 or more (a typical game is about 45%). Games like this went over only 47-49% of the time in 2021-26. Final: 7 goals (ANA 2, NYR 5), so it went over 6.5 and the call was wrong.
9:00 PM ET🔨 SLAM
O 6.5W paper W +0.71u
PIT#11 OFF / #23 DEF43.27●
A. Silovs ✓Trash 2
UTA#6 OFF / #8 DEF53.79●
S. Cossa ✓Trash 19
9 goals · proj 7.06 · P(7+) 56%
5v5
PP
Gl
Oth
B2B
Spd
Inj
PIT
2.21
0.58
+0.5%
0.49
–
-3.5%
+2.4%
UTA
2.30
0.68
+4.4%
0.48
–
+3.7%
+1.2%
Why this call
Team
5-on-5
OFF
OPP DEF
Proj
PIT
2.30#3 of 32
1.95#12 of 32
2.21goals
UTA
2.22#7 of 32
2.11#22 of 32
2.30goals
Team
Power play
OFF
OPP DEF
Proj
PIT
0.58#16 of 32
0.56#12 of 32
0.58goals
UTA
0.70#2 of 32
0.54#6 of 32
0.68goals
Key players: top 5 attackers & defenders
Top 5 attackers
Player
If out
Pre-game
PIT
Sidney Crosby C
-3.9%
Plays
Bryan Rust R
-2.9%
Plays
Rickard Rakell R
-2.8%
Plays
Evgeni Malkin C
-2.7%
Plays
Erik Karlsson D
-1.8%
Plays
UTA
Dylan Guenther R
-3.9%
Plays
Clayton Keller R
-3.8%
Plays
Nick Schmaltz C
-3.5%
Plays
Logan Cooley C
-2.5%
Plays
Mikhail Sergachev D
-1.5%
Plays
Top 5 defenders
Player
If out
Pre-game
PIT
Tommy Novak C
+0.9%
Plays
Ben Kindel C
+0.8%
Plays
Samuel Girard D
+0.8%
OUT
Kaedan Korczak D
+0.6%
Plays
Egor Chinakhov R
+0.6%
Day-to-day
UTA
Clayton Keller R
+1.5%
Plays
Nate Schmidt D
+1.4%
Plays
Barrett Hayton C
+1.1%
Plays
Nick Schmaltz C
+1.0%
Plays
John Marino D
+0.9%
OUT
Also out: UTA: Michael Carcone -0.7% attack, +0.7% defense
Defender numbers are a rough guide: tested on 2021-26 lineups, the defensive side of the injury adjustment is too small and noisy to prove on its own (it swings season to season). Attacker numbers hold up every season.
How the projection moved on game day (6.90 → 7.06)
12:01 AM 6.90 first run
12:52 AM 6.95 +0.05UTA goalie: Karel Vejmelka → Sebastian Cossa +0.05; PIT goalie Arturs Silovs: Projected → Likely
5:33 AM 6.90 -0.05UTA goalie: Sebastian Cossa → Karel Vejmelka -0.05
11:18 AM 6.89 -0.01rounding; UTA lineup: last game's lineup (2026-10-17); Line 6.5 o-125 → 6.5 o-129
12:18 PM 6.89 Line 6.5 o-129 → 6.5 o-130
1:17 PM 6.95 +0.05UTA goalie: Karel Vejmelka → Sebastian Cossa +0.05; UTA lineup: Cole Bagley Oct 19 1:14 PM
2:17 PM 7.00 +0.05Injuries / lineup: Elmer Soderblom (PIT) out, Ville Koivunen (PIT) out, Egor Chinakhov (PIT) back in +0.05; PIT goalie Arturs Silovs: Likely → Confirmed; Egor Chinakhov (PIT) day-to-day; PIT lineup: Josh Getzoff Oct 19 1:38 PM
2:45 PM 7.00 no change
3:18 PM 7.00 Line 6.5 o-130 → 6.5 o-131
4:18 PM 7.00 no change
4:38 PM 6.98 -0.02Injuries / lineup: Ville Koivunen (PIT) back in -0.01; PIT lineup: Projected Oct 19 4:27 PM
5:17 PM 6.98 no change
6:17 PM 6.98 Line 6.5 o-131 → 6.5 o-133
6:45 PM 6.98 no change
7:18 PM 6.98 no change
8:17 PM 6.98 no change
8:26 PM 6.98 no change
8:45 PM 7.06 +0.08Injuries / lineup: Samuel Girard (PIT) out, John Marino (UTA) out, Nick DeSimone (UTA) back in +0.07; UTA lineup: Utah Mammoth Oct 19 8:42 PM
A log of every model run for this game (about hourly, frozen at puck drop): the change in the total and what caused it (a goalie switch, players out / back in, or ratings / other data such as games finished elsewhere and refreshed stats), plus anything else the scraper picked up (goalie confirmed, day-to-day players, a new projected lineup, the line moving), or no change. Each team's change is split by how much each factor moved; small leftovers count as ratings / other.
🔨 SLAM: both teams project as high-scoring (PIT 3.27, UTA 3.79; cutoff 3.10), the line is 6.5, and both are good or better at 5-on-5, the strongest over spot the model has. At 5-on-5, PIT is great (2.21) and UTA is great (2.30); on the power play, PIT is mid (0.58) and UTA is great (0.68). PIT faces Sebastian Cossa, a Trash goalie, grade 19 (+0.5%); UTA faces Arturs Silovs, a Trash goalie, grade 2 (+4.4%). Other factors: PIT's team speed costs 3.5%; injuries help PIT 2.4%; UTA's team speed adds 3.7%. PIT 3.27: 0.16 goals above what an average team would score (3.11). Pushing it up: 5-on-5 matchup +0.17 (its attack ranks #3 of 32, UTA's defense #12); injuries +0.07 (missing players on both teams, net, +2.4%); Sebastian Cossa in goal +0.02 (a Trash goalie, grade 19, +0.5%). Holding it back: team speed -0.11 (it skates slower than UTA, -3.5%).UTA 3.79: 0.69 goals above what an average team would score (3.11). Pushing it up: 5-on-5 matchup +0.26 (its attack ranks #7 of 32, PIT's defense #22); Arturs Silovs in goal +0.15 (a Trash goalie, grade 2, +4.4%); team speed +0.13 (it skates faster than PIT, +3.7%); power play +0.11 (its power play ranks #2, PIT's penalty kill and penalty habits #6); injuries +0.04 (missing players on both teams, net, +1.2%). The model projects 7.06 total goals against a 6.5 line, with a 56% chance of 7 or more (a typical game is about 45%). Games like this went over 55% of the time at the opening line and 56.5% at the closing line in 2021-26. Final: 9 goals (PIT 4, UTA 5), so it went over 6.5 and the call was right.
7:30 PM ETAVOIDnear miss −0.01⚠ lineup
U 6.5✓ under
SJS#23 OFF / #29 DEF13.08●
Y. Askarov ✓Trash 3
TOR#21 OFF / #31 DEF33.32●
S. Bobrovsky ✓OK 38
4 goals · proj 6.41 · P(7+) 49%
5v5
PP
Gl
Oth
B2B
Spd
Inj
SJS
1.91
0.73
-1.3%
0.49
–
-0.4%
–
TOR
2.04
0.76
+4.1%
0.48
–
+0.1%
-2.8%
Why this call
⚠ Lineup change since 12:01 AM: William Nylander now Day-to-day (was Plays, seen 11:18 AM) · TOR ±4.6% · projection 6.21 → 6.41
Team
5-on-5
OFF
OPP DEF
Proj
SJS
1.79#28 of 32
2.17#26 of 32
1.91goals
TOR
1.95#22 of 32
2.13#24 of 32
2.04goals
Team
Power play
OFF
OPP DEF
Proj
SJS
0.61#12 of 32
0.66#27 of 32
0.73goals
TOR
0.58#15 of 32
0.72#32 of 32
0.76goals
Key players: top 5 attackers & defenders
Top 5 attackers
Player
If out
Pre-game
SJS
Macklin Celebrini C
-4.9%
Plays
Will Smith C
-2.4%
Plays
Tyler Toffoli C
-1.9%
Plays
Alexander Wennberg C
-1.0%
Plays
Kiefer Sherwood L
-0.8%
Plays
TOR
⚠ William Nylander R
-4.6%
Day-to-daywas Plays
Auston Matthews C
-4.0%
–
John Tavares C
-3.3%
OUT · IR
Kirill Marchenko R
-1.4%
–
Darren Raddysh D
-1.1%
–
Top 5 defenders
Player
If out
Pre-game
SJS
Macklin Celebrini C
+0.9%
Plays
Tyler Toffoli C
+0.7%
Plays
Will Smith C
+0.7%
Plays
Dmitry Orlov D
+0.7%
Plays
Sam Dickinson D
+0.4%
Plays
TOR
Darren Raddysh D
+0.5%
–
Jack Roslovic C
+0.4%
–
Kirill Marchenko R
+0.4%
–
Oliver Ekman-Larsson D
+0.3%
–
Nick Paul L
+0.3%
–
Defender numbers are a rough guide: tested on 2021-26 lineups, the defensive side of the injury adjustment is too small and noisy to prove on its own (it swings season to season). Attacker numbers hold up every season.
How the projection moved on game day (6.21 → 6.41)
12:01 AM 6.21 first run
12:52 AM 6.33 +0.12SJS goalie: Alex Nedeljkovic → Yaroslav Askarov +0.12; TOR goalie Anthony Stolarz: Projected → Likely
5:33 AM 6.33 no change
11:18 AM 6.41 +0.08TOR goalie: Anthony Stolarz → Sergei Bobrovsky +0.08; SJS lineup: last game's lineup (2026-10-17); William Nylander (TOR) day-to-day; TOR lineup: Mark Masters Oct 19 10:47 AM; Line 6.5 o-125 → 6.5 o-126
12:18 PM 6.41 SJS lineup: Max Miller Oct 19 12:00 PM; Line 6.5 o-126 → 6.5 o-130
7:18 PM 6.41 SJS lineup: Sheng Peng Oct 19 7:11 PM; Line 6.5 o-136 → 6.5 o-144
A log of every model run for this game (about hourly, frozen at puck drop): the change in the total and what caused it (a goalie switch, players out / back in, or ratings / other data such as games finished elsewhere and refreshed stats), plus anything else the scraper picked up (goalie confirmed, day-to-day players, a new projected lineup, the line moving), or no change. Each team's change is split by how much each factor moved; small leftovers count as ratings / other.
AVOID: SJS projects under the 3.10-goal high-scoring cutoff (SJS 3.08). SJS just misses the cutoff (by 0.01), and the rule needs both teams over it, so the 6.41 total isn't enough on its own. At 5-on-5, SJS is bad (1.91) and TOR is mid (2.04); on the power play, SJS is great (0.73) and TOR is great (0.76). SJS faces Sergei Bobrovsky, an OK goalie, grade 38 (-1.3%); TOR faces Yaroslav Askarov, a Trash goalie, grade 3 (+4.1%). Other factors: injuries cost TOR 2.8%. SJS 3.08: 0.02 goals below what an average team would score (3.11). Pushing it up: power play +0.15 (its power play ranks #12, TOR's penalty kill and penalty habits #27). Holding it back: 5-on-5 matchup -0.12 (its attack ranks #28 of 32, TOR's defense #26); Sergei Bobrovsky in goal -0.04 (an OK goalie, grade 38, -1.3%); team speed -0.01 (it skates slower than TOR, -0.4%).TOR 3.32: 0.22 goals above what an average team would score (3.11). Pushing it up: power play +0.18 (its power play ranks #15, SJS's penalty kill and penalty habits #32); Yaroslav Askarov in goal +0.13 (a Trash goalie, grade 3, +4.1%). Holding it back: injuries -0.10 (missing players on both teams, net, -2.8%). The model projects 6.41 total goals against a 6.5 line, with a 49% chance of 7 or more (a typical game is about 45%). Games like this went over only 47-49% of the time in 2021-26. Final: 4 goals (SJS 1, TOR 3), so it stayed under 6.5 and the call was right.
7:00 PM ETAVOID
U 6.5✓ under
COL#2 OFF / #3 DEF24.16●
M. Blackwood ✓Mid 44
PHI#32 OFF / #19 DEF32.24●
J. Woll ✓Mid 60
5 goals · proj 6.39 · P(7+) 42%
5v5
PP
Gl
Oth
B2B
Spd
Inj
COL
2.83
0.63
-3.0%
0.49
–
+5.5%
+3.0%
PHI
1.53
0.41
-1.7%
0.50
–
-4.7%
-2.0%
Why this call
Team
5-on-5
OFF
OPP DEF
Proj
COL
2.65#1 of 32
2.17#27 of 32
2.83goals
PHI
1.61#32 of 32
1.94#10 of 32
1.53goals
Team
Power play
OFF
OPP DEF
Proj
COL
0.58#17 of 32
0.60#23 of 32
0.63goals
PHI
0.48#27 of 32
0.47#2 of 32
0.41goals
Key players: top 5 attackers & defenders
Top 5 attackers
Player
If out
Pre-game
COL
Nathan MacKinnon C
-7.0%
Plays
Martin Necas C
-5.2%
Plays
Cale Makar D
-3.2%
Plays
Brock Nelson C
-2.9%
Plays
Artturi Lehkonen L
-2.7%
Plays
PHI
Trevor Zegras C
-2.0%
Plays
Matvei Michkov R
-1.9%
Plays
Travis Konecny R
-1.6%
OUT · IR
Owen Tippett R
-1.5%
OUT · IR
Tyson Foerster R
-0.7%
OUT
Top 5 defenders
Player
If out
Pre-game
COL
Martin Necas C
+1.5%
Plays
Nathan MacKinnon C
+1.4%
Plays
Sam Malinski D
+1.3%
Plays
Brett Kulak D
+0.9%
Plays
Cale Makar D
+0.9%
Plays
PHI
Jamie Drysdale D
+1.1%
Plays
Owen Tippett R
+1.0%
OUT · IR
Noah Cates L
+0.9%
Plays
Matvei Michkov R
+0.9%
Plays
Trevor Zegras C
+0.9%
Plays
Defender numbers are a rough guide: tested on 2021-26 lineups, the defensive side of the injury adjustment is too small and noisy to prove on its own (it swings season to season). Attacker numbers hold up every season.
How the projection moved on game day (6.49 → 6.39)
12:01 AM 6.49 first run
12:52 AM 6.34 -0.15PHI goalie: Dan Vladar → Joseph Woll -0.10; COL goalie: Mackenzie Blackwood → Scott Wedgewood -0.05
5:33 AM 6.49 +0.15PHI goalie: Joseph Woll → Dan Vladar +0.10; COL goalie: Scott Wedgewood → Mackenzie Blackwood +0.05; Line 6.5 o+109 → 6.5 o+110
11:18 AM 6.38 -0.11PHI goalie: Dan Vladar → Joseph Woll -0.10; Line 6.5 o+110 → 6.5 o+109
12:18 PM 6.38 COL goalie Mackenzie Blackwood: Likely → Confirmed
1:18 PM 6.38 COL lineup: Bailey Curtis Oct 19 1:04 PM
2:17 PM 6.38 COL lineup: Aarif Deen Oct 19 1:57 PM
2:45 PM 6.39 +0.01Injuries / lineup: Tyson Foerster (PHI) out +0.01; PHI lineup: Projected Oct 19 2:26 PM
3:18 PM 6.39 no change
4:18 PM 6.39 no change
4:38 PM 6.39 no change
5:17 PM 6.39 Line 6.5 o+109 → 6.5 o-102
6:17 PM 6.39 no change
6:45 PM 6.39 PHI lineup: Will James Oct 19 6:38 PM
A log of every model run for this game (about hourly, frozen at puck drop): the change in the total and what caused it (a goalie switch, players out / back in, or ratings / other data such as games finished elsewhere and refreshed stats), plus anything else the scraper picked up (goalie confirmed, day-to-day players, a new projected lineup, the line moving), or no change. Each team's change is split by how much each factor moved; small leftovers count as ratings / other.
AVOID: PHI projects under the 3.10-goal high-scoring cutoff (PHI 2.24). The 6.39 total looks high, but most of it comes from COL; the over rule needs both teams scoring. At 5-on-5, COL is great (2.83) and PHI is trash (1.53); on the power play, COL is good (0.63) and PHI is trash (0.41). COL faces Joseph Woll, a Mid goalie, grade 60 (-3.0%); PHI faces Mackenzie Blackwood, a Mid goalie, grade 44 (-1.7%). Other factors: COL's team speed adds 5.5%; injuries help COL 3.0%; PHI's team speed costs 4.7%; injuries cost PHI 2.0%. COL 4.16: 1.05 goals above what an average team would score (3.11). Pushing it up: 5-on-5 matchup +0.79 (its attack ranks #1 of 32, PHI's defense #27); team speed +0.21 (it skates faster than PHI, +5.5%); injuries +0.12 (missing players on both teams, net, +3.0%); power play +0.05 (its power play ranks #17, PHI's penalty kill and penalty habits #23). Holding it back: Joseph Woll in goal -0.12 (a Mid goalie, grade 60, -3.0%).PHI 2.24: 0.87 goals below what an average team would score (3.11). Holding it back: 5-on-5 matchup -0.51 (its attack ranks #32 of 32, COL's defense #10); power play -0.17 (its power play ranks #27, COL's penalty kill and penalty habits #2); team speed -0.11 (it skates slower than COL, -4.7%); injuries -0.05 (missing players on both teams, net, -2.0%); Mackenzie Blackwood in goal -0.04 (a Mid goalie, grade 44, -1.7%). The model projects 6.39 total goals against a 6.5 line, with a 42% chance of 7 or more (a typical game is about 45%). Games like this went over only 47-49% of the time in 2021-26. Final: 5 goals (COL 2, PHI 3), so it stayed under 6.5 and the call was right.
7:00 PM ETAVOIDnear miss −0.04
O 6.5✗ went over
ANA#9 OFF / #22 DEF23.05●
V. Husso ✓Trash 10
NYR#22 OFF / #9 DEF53.14●
D. Garand ✓Mid 54
7 goals · proj 6.19 · P(7+) 48%
5v5
PP
Gl
Oth
B2B
Spd
Inj
ANA
2.02
0.59
-2.6%
0.49
–
+2.3%
-1.2%
NYR
1.95
0.69
+2.1%
0.49
–
-2.2%
+0.5%
Why this call
Team
5-on-5
OFF
OPP DEF
Proj
ANA
2.07#13 of 32
1.99#13 of 32
2.02goals
NYR
1.86#26 of 32
2.13#24 of 32
1.95goals
Team
Power play
OFF
OPP DEF
Proj
ANA
0.60#13 of 32
0.54#7 of 32
0.59goals
NYR
0.62#10 of 32
0.62#24 of 32
0.69goals
Key players: top 5 attackers & defenders
Top 5 attackers
Player
If out
Pre-game
ANA
Beckett Sennecke R
-3.3%
Plays
Leo Carlsson C
-3.2%
Plays
Cutter Gauthier L
-3.1%
Plays
Mikael Granlund C
-2.0%
Plays
Troy Terry R
-1.4%
OUT · IR
NYR
Mika Zibanejad C
-3.1%
Plays
Alexis Lafrenière L
-2.5%
Plays
J.T. Miller C
-2.2%
Plays
Adam Fox D
-1.8%
Plays
Pavel Dorofeyev R
-1.4%
Plays
Top 5 defenders
Player
If out
Pre-game
ANA
Leo Carlsson C
+0.6%
Plays
Beckett Sennecke R
+0.5%
Plays
Cutter Gauthier L
+0.5%
Plays
Ian Moore D
+0.4%
OUT · IR
Jackson LaCombe D
+0.3%
Plays
NYR
Alexis Lafrenière L
+0.8%
Plays
Adam Fox D
+0.7%
Plays
Pavel Dorofeyev R
+0.7%
Plays
Gabe Perreault R
+0.5%
Plays
Oliver Bjorkstrand R
+0.4%
Plays
Defender numbers are a rough guide: tested on 2021-26 lineups, the defensive side of the injury adjustment is too small and noisy to prove on its own (it swings season to season). Attacker numbers hold up every season.
How the projection moved on game day (6.11 → 6.19)
12:01 AM 6.11 first run
12:53 AM 6.11 ANA goalie Lukas Dostal: Projected → Likely; NYR goalie Dylan Garand: Projected → Likely
5:33 AM 6.11 Line 6.5 o+104 → 6.5 o+103
11:18 AM 6.11 NYR goalie Dylan Garand: Likely → Confirmed; NYR lineup: Colin Stephenson Oct 19 10:44 AM; Line 6.5 o+103 → 6.5 o+100
12:17 PM 6.19 +0.08ANA goalie: Lukas Dostal → Ville Husso +0.08; Line 6.5 o+100 → 6.5 o-110
1:18 PM 6.19 ANA lineup: Jonny Lazarus Oct 19 1:01 PM; Line 6.5 o-110 → 6.5 o-111
2:17 PM 6.19 Mikael Granlund (ANA) off day-to-day; ANA lineup: Zach Cavanagh Oct 19 1:24 PM; Line 6.5 o-111 → 6.5 o-110
A log of every model run for this game (about hourly, frozen at puck drop): the change in the total and what caused it (a goalie switch, players out / back in, or ratings / other data such as games finished elsewhere and refreshed stats), plus anything else the scraper picked up (goalie confirmed, day-to-day players, a new projected lineup, the line moving), or no change. Each team's change is split by how much each factor moved; small leftovers count as ratings / other.
AVOID: ANA projects under the 3.10-goal high-scoring cutoff (ANA 3.05). ANA just misses the cutoff (by 0.04), and the rule needs both teams over it, so the 6.19 total isn't enough on its own. At 5-on-5, ANA is mid (2.02) and NYR is mid (1.95); on the power play, ANA is mid (0.59) and NYR is great (0.69). ANA faces Dylan Garand, a Mid goalie, grade 54 (-2.6%); NYR faces Ville Husso, a Trash goalie, grade 10 (+2.1%). Other factors: ANA's team speed adds 2.3%; NYR's team speed costs 2.2%. ANA 3.05: 0.05 goals below what an average team would score (3.11). Pushing it up: team speed +0.07 (it skates faster than NYR, +2.3%); power play +0.01 (its power play ranks #13, NYR's penalty kill and penalty habits #7). Holding it back: Dylan Garand in goal -0.08 (a Mid goalie, grade 54, -2.6%); injuries -0.04 (missing players on both teams, net, -1.2%); 5-on-5 matchup -0.02 (its attack ranks #13 of 32, NYR's defense #13).NYR 3.14: 0.03 goals above what an average team would score (3.11). Pushing it up: power play +0.11 (its power play ranks #10, ANA's penalty kill and penalty habits #24); Ville Husso in goal +0.07 (a Trash goalie, grade 10, +2.1%); injuries +0.02 (missing players on both teams, net, +0.5%). Holding it back: 5-on-5 matchup -0.09 (its attack ranks #26 of 32, ANA's defense #24); team speed -0.07 (it skates slower than ANA, -2.2%). The model projects 6.19 total goals against a 6.5 line, with a 48% chance of 7 or more (a typical game is about 45%). Games like this went over only 47-49% of the time in 2021-26. Final: 7 goals (ANA 2, NYR 5), so it went over 6.5 and the call was wrong.
Two rows per game (away, then home). ● = team projected high-scoring. Proj = (5v5 + PP + Oth) × goalie (Gl) × back-to-back (B2B) × team speed (Spd) × injuries (Inj). Hover or tap any underlined label for an explanation.